Our Values Are

Historical Context

The phrase "Kindness Is Everything" encapsulates a fundamental human value that has been celebrated across cultures, religions, and philosophical traditions throughout history. While the exact phrasing gained particular prominence in contemporary social justice movements, the underlying principle—that compassion and care for others should be central to human interaction—has deep historical roots.

The concept of kindness appears in ancient philosophical and religious texts worldwide. Confucian thought emphasized "ren" (benevolence or humaneness) as the fundamental virtue that should guide human relationships.1 In Buddhist traditions, "karuna" (compassion) is considered essential to enlightenment and is practiced through active care for the suffering of others.2 Jewish tradition speaks of "chesed" (loving-kindness), while Christianity emphasizes love of neighbor as core to spiritual practice.3 Islamic teachings highlight "rahma" (mercy and compassion) as attributes of Allah that humans should embody.4

Beyond religious contexts, philosophers throughout history have recognized kindness as essential to human flourishing. Aristotle included kindness among the virtues necessary for a good life, while Enlightenment thinkers like David Hume and Adam Smith argued that natural sympathy or "fellow-feeling" for others formed the basis of moral systems.5 Even as philosophical traditions diverged on many issues, kindness as a virtue remained remarkably consistent across different schools of thought.

However, kindness has sometimes been dismissed as merely personal or sentimental, particularly in political and economic contexts that prioritize competition, self-interest, or "tough" approaches to social problems. Throughout the industrial revolution and the rise of capitalism, systems often developed that subordinated care and compassion to profit and efficiency.6 Modern political ideologies sometimes framed kindness as a private virtue irrelevant to public policy or institutional design.

The phrase "Kindness Is Everything" in its contemporary form gained prominence as a response to increasing political polarization and harsh rhetoric, particularly in the United States following the 2016 presidential election. The slogan appeared on yard signs, bumper stickers, and social media, often alongside other affirmations like "Black Lives Matter," "Love Is Love," and "Science Is Real."7

One origin story traces the phrase to a handwritten sign created by a Madison, Wisconsin resident in late 2016. Jennifer Rosen Heinz noticed the sign in her neighborhood and worked with a local print shop to create a yard sign version that quickly spread throughout the community and eventually across the country. The sign was explicitly created as a response to political rhetoric perceived as divisive and dehumanizing.8

This modern incarnation of "Kindness Is Everything" connects individual acts of compassion to broader social justice concerns, suggesting that kindness isn't merely a personal virtue but a necessary foundation for creating just and equitable communities. It implies that kindness must extend beyond our immediate circles to include those who are marginalized, vulnerable, or different from ourselves.

The phrase also challenges the false dichotomy between kindness and strength, or between compassion and justice. As activist and writer Valarie Kaur argues in her concept of "revolutionary love," true kindness isn't passive or sentimental but requires courage and commitment to stand against oppression while still recognizing the humanity of all people.9

In recent years, scientific research has increasingly validated the importance of kindness for individual and collective wellbeing. Studies in neuroscience, psychology, and sociology demonstrate that kindness improves mental health, strengthens immune function, enhances relationships, and builds social capital in communities.10 Research on adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and trauma-informed approaches has highlighted how essential kindness and compassion are to healing from individual and collective trauma.11

As we navigate complex social challenges—from political polarization to climate change, from economic inequality to systemic discrimination—"Kindness Is Everything" serves as a reminder that how we treat each other matters fundamentally. It suggests that the solutions to our most pressing problems must include not just policy changes or technological innovations but a fundamental commitment to recognizing and honoring each other's humanity.

Current Challenges

Despite widespread nominal agreement on the value of kindness, numerous forces in contemporary society work against its practice and cultivation:

Political Polarization and Dehumanization

Political discourse, particularly in the United States and other polarized democracies, increasingly portrays opposing groups not just as mistaken but as fundamentally threatening or evil. This "affective polarization"—where people feel intense negative emotions toward those with different political views—makes kindness across difference increasingly difficult.12

Social media algorithms often amplify divisive content that provokes outrage rather than empathy, creating filter bubbles that limit exposure to different perspectives and reinforce negative stereotypes about outgroups.13 Research shows that the more time people spend on certain social platforms, the more likely they are to view political opponents as malicious rather than simply misguided.14

This dehumanizing rhetoric extends beyond politics to impact how marginalized groups are portrayed and treated. When groups are consistently described using dehumanizing language or framed as threats, research shows that people become more willing to support policies that harm these groups and less likely to respond with empathy to their suffering.15

Economic Systems That Undervalue Care

Capitalist economic systems typically undervalue and undercompensate care work—the labor of tending to human needs through teaching, nursing, childcare, elder care, and other forms of service. This work, disproportionately performed by women and people of color, is essential to human flourishing yet receives less social recognition and financial compensation than many other forms of labor.16

The prioritization of profit over wellbeing in many business models can create workplace cultures where kindness is seen as inefficient or unprofessional. Employees may be discouraged from taking time to support colleagues, connect with customers, or address emotional needs that don't directly contribute to productivity metrics.17

On a broader scale, economic policies often prioritize growth and efficiency over care and connection. Measures like GDP ignore unpaid care work and don't account for the quality of relationships or psychological wellbeing, creating incentives that can undermine the conditions for kindness to flourish.18

Digital Communication and Disconnection

While digital technologies connect people across vast distances, they also transform how we interact in ways that can impede kindness. Online communication often lacks the nonverbal cues that help generate empathy, making it easier to forget the human being on the other side of the screen.19

The anonymity of many online spaces can reduce accountability for unkind behaviors, contributing to phenomena like cyberbullying, trolling, and online harassment. Studies show that people are significantly more likely to make cruel comments online than they would in face-to-face interactions.20

Even beyond explicitly harmful behaviors, digital communication patterns can erode capacity for empathy and connection. Constant partial attention—where people are simultaneously engaged with devices and in-person interactions—can prevent the deep listening and presence that kindness requires.21

Stress, Burnout, and Compassion Fatigue

Chronic stress and burnout deplete the psychological resources needed for kindness. When people feel overwhelmed by their own challenges—whether financial pressure, work demands, or health concerns—they have less capacity to attend to others' needs.22

For those in helping professions or activism, compassion fatigue can result from witnessing suffering without adequate support or seeing limited progress despite significant effort. This emotional exhaustion can make sustaining kindness increasingly difficult, especially toward those perceived as contributing to problems.23

The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated many of these stressors while simultaneously increasing needs for care and support. Essential workers faced unprecedented demands, parents juggled work with childcare, and many people experienced isolation, loss, and uncertainty—all conditions that can make practicing kindness more challenging even as it becomes more necessary.24

Systemic Injustice and the Limits of Individual Kindness

While individual acts of kindness are valuable, they cannot alone address systemic injustice and structural violence. When "kindness" is promoted without acknowledging power differentials or systemic oppression, it can inadvertently reinforce harmful systems by suggesting that better interpersonal behavior is sufficient to solve structural problems.25

This tension can create cynicism about calls for kindness, particularly among those working for social justice. If "kindness" seems to demand politeness from the oppressed while failing to require substantive change from those with power, it may appear as a tool for maintaining the status quo rather than transforming unjust systems.26

The challenge lies in connecting interpersonal kindness with systemic change—recognizing that both are necessary and that they can reinforce rather than contradict each other when kindness is understood as including justice, truth-telling, and accountability alongside compassion and care.

What We Can Do

Advancing the principle that "Kindness Is Everything" requires action at multiple levels:

Individual Actions

• Practice self-compassion as the foundation for extending kindness to others. Research shows that being kind to yourself—acknowledging your own struggles with gentleness rather than judgment—increases your capacity for empathy and compassion toward others.27

• Cultivate mindful awareness of your thoughts, feelings, and reactions, especially in challenging interactions. The space between stimulus and response allows for choosing kindness even when it isn't your first impulse.28

• Develop active listening skills by focusing fully on understanding others rather than preparing your response. Simple practices like maintaining eye contact, asking clarifying questions, and summarizing what you've heard can dramatically improve connection.29

• Engage in regular acts of kindness, both spontaneous and planned. Research shows that performing kind acts boosts wellbeing for both the giver and receiver, creating positive feedback loops that strengthen the habit of kindness.30

• Extend kindness across difference by deliberately seeking to understand and connect with people whose identities, backgrounds, or viewpoints differ from your own. This "bridging" work is essential for counteracting polarization and building social cohesion.31

Interpersonal and Community Actions

• Create kindness rituals in families, friend groups, workplaces, or communities, such as appreciation circles, gratitude practices, or regular volunteering together. These rituals help institutionalize kindness as a shared value and practice.32

• Support restorative approaches to conflict that focus on repairing harm and rebuilding relationships rather than punishment or exclusion. These approaches—used in schools, justice systems, and communities—embody kindness while maintaining accountability.33

• Build "communities of care" by organizing mutual aid networks, timebanks, or other structures that facilitate the exchange of support based on solidarity rather than charity. These systems make kindness sustainable and reciprocal rather than depleting.34

• Transform digital interactions by modeling constructive engagement online, supporting platforms with healthier interaction designs, and creating community guidelines that foster kindness without suppressing honest communication.35

• Cultivate intergenerational connections that allow wisdom, energy, and care to flow between age groups. These connections address isolation among older adults while providing younger people with mentorship and perspective.36

Institutional and Systemic Actions

• Implement trauma-informed approaches in education, healthcare, social services, and other systems that recognize and respond to the impact of trauma while actively avoiding retraumatization. These approaches center safety, trustworthiness, choice, collaboration, and empowerment.37

• Advocate for economic policies that value and support care work, including fair wages for care workers, paid family and medical leave, affordable childcare, and universal healthcare. These policies recognize that caring for each other is essential work that should be properly resourced.38

• Transform organizational cultures to prioritize psychological safety, cooperation, and meaningful connection alongside productivity. Research shows that kind workplaces not only improve wellbeing but also enhance creativity, innovation, and long-term performance.39

• Design public spaces that facilitate connection and cooperation through features like comfortable seating arranged for conversation, community gardens, public art, and infrastructure that brings diverse community members into contact.40

• Reform systems that currently operate through punishment, exclusion, or control to incorporate more restorative, healing-centered approaches. This includes everything from school discipline practices to criminal justice systems to mental health interventions.41

Educational Actions

• Integrate social-emotional learning throughout educational systems from early childhood through higher education. These approaches teach empathy, perspective-taking, emotion regulation, and conflict resolution as core skills for academic and life success.42

• Teach kindness as a practice that requires skill development rather than just good intentions. This includes explicit instruction in empathic listening, nonviolent communication, cultural humility, and bystander intervention.43

• Incorporate service learning that connects academic content with meaningful community engagement, helping students develop both knowledge and a commitment to using that knowledge in service of others.44

• Highlight historical movements that have successfully used love, compassion, and nonviolence to create social change, demonstrating that kindness can be a powerful force for justice rather than a passive acceptance of harm.45

• Create learning environments where every student feels seen, valued, and supported while being appropriately challenged to grow. This requires attention to belonging, representation, accessibility, and culturally responsive teaching practices.46

Organizations Promoting Kindness and Compassion

If you're looking to support or learn more about kindness initiatives, these organizations are doing important work:

Kindness-Focused Organizations

• Random Acts of Kindness Foundation - Provides free resources to encourage acts of kindness in schools, communities, and workplaces

• Kindness.org - Conducts research on kindness and creates evidence-based kindness initiatives

• World Kindness Movement - International federation working to inspire kindness in countries around the world

• The Kindness Curriculum - Research-based approach to teaching kindness in early childhood developed by the Center for Healthy Minds

• Kind Campaign - Organization focused on ending girl-against-girl bullying through education and kindness programs

Compassion and Empathy Organizations

• Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education (Stanford University) - Conducts scientific research on compassion and offers training programs

• Greater Good Science Center (UC Berkeley) - Studies the psychology, sociology, and neuroscience of well-being, including kindness and compassion

• Empathy Lab - Uses storytelling to build empathy skills in children and young people

• Charter for Compassion - Global movement promoting compassionate action through partnerships in cities, schools, and faith communities

• Center for Building a Culture of Empathy - Working to build a global movement for empathy through research, education, and arts

Community Care and Mutual Aid Organizations

• Mutual Aid Disaster Relief - Grassroots network providing disaster relief based on principles of solidarity and mutual aid

• Repair Revolution - Building neighborhood repair economies through skill-sharing and community connection

• Pod Mapping for Mutual Aid - Tool for organizing care networks developed by disability justice activists

• Little Free Pantry - Movement enabling neighborly food sharing through accessible pantry boxes

• The People's Supper - Organization bringing people together across difference for meaningful conversation over shared meals

Conclusion

The declaration that "Kindness Is Everything" represents both a timeless human value and a particularly urgent reminder in our current moment of division, disconnection, and dehumanization. It affirms that how we treat each other matters fundamentally—not just for individual wellbeing, but for our collective ability to address the complex challenges facing humanity.

This statement isn't a call for superficial niceness that avoids difficult truths or maintains unjust systems. Rather, it points toward a deeper understanding of kindness that encompasses both compassion and justice, both gentleness and courage, both care for individuals and commitment to transforming harmful structures. It reminds us that genuine kindness requires seeing the full humanity of others—their dignity, their struggles, their capacity for growth—even across profound differences.

As we display the Our Values Are image with its declaration that "KINDNESS IS EVERYTHING," we commit to cultivating this expansive kind of kindness in ourselves and our communities. We acknowledge that this work isn't always easy, particularly when facing systems that incentivize competition over cooperation, polarization over connection, and judgment over understanding. Yet we recognize that the alternatives—cynicism, dehumanization, indifference—ultimately diminish both individual flourishing and our collective capacity to create a better world.

By understanding both the historical context of kindness as a human value and the particular challenges to its expression in our current moment, we can approach this work with greater clarity and effectiveness. By taking concrete actions at individual, interpersonal, institutional, and educational levels, we contribute to building cultures where kindness is not just an occasional sentiment but a foundational practice for how we relate to ourselves, each other, and the living world.

In a time when technological advancement often outpaces moral wisdom, when economic systems frequently prioritize profit over people, and when political discourse increasingly frames opponents as enemies, "Kindness Is Everything" serves as a necessary corrective and reorientation. It reminds us that technical solutions alone cannot address our deepest challenges without the companion values of compassion, care, and connection.

By prioritizing kindness not as a luxury or afterthought but as essential to human flourishing, we help create communities where everyone can thrive—where differences are approached with curiosity rather than fear, where struggles are met with support rather than judgment, and where our shared humanity remains visible even in moments of profound disagreement. This vision isn't merely sentimental; it's a practical necessity for navigating the complex interdependence that defines our existence on this planet.

References

1. Confucius, & Slingerland, E. (2003). Analects: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Hackett Publishing Company.

2. Dalai Lama, & Cutler, H. C. (1998). The Art of Happiness: A Handbook for Living. Riverhead Books.

3. Armstrong, K. (2010). Twelve Steps to a Compassionate Life. Knopf.

4. Nasr, S. H. (2004). The Heart of Islam: Enduring Values for Humanity. HarperOne.

5. Nussbaum, M. C. (2014). Compassion and Terror. In K. R. Monroe (Ed.), The Heart of Altruism: Perceptions of a Common Humanity (pp. 10-27). Princeton University Press.

6. Tronto, J. C. (2013). Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice. NYU Press.

7. Gollom, M. (2016, November 28). 'In this house, we believe...' The story behind those signs popping up on lawns. CBC News. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/lawn-signs-trump-1.386984

8. Heinz, J. R. (2017, January 18). Why I Created the 'Kindness is Everything' Sign. Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@JRHeinz/why-i-created-the-kindness-is-everything-sign-6a3f8f528a14

9. Kaur, V. (2020). See No Stranger: A Memoir and Manifesto of Revolutionary Love. One World.

10. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111-131.

11. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). SAMHSA's Concept of Trauma and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4884.

12. Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129-146.

13. Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216-9221.

14. Rathje, S., Van Bavel, J. J., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(26), e2024292118.

15. Kteily, N., Hodson, G., & Bruneau, E. (2016). They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(3), 343-370.

16. Folbre, N. (2012). For Love and Money: Care Provision in the United States. Russell Sage Foundation.

17. Worline, M. C., & Dutton, J. E. (2017). Awakening Compassion at Work: The Quiet Power That Elevates People and Organizations. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

18. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn't Add Up. The New Press.

19. Waytz, A., & Gray, K. (2018). Does Online Technology Make Us More or Less Sociable? A Preliminary Review and Call for Research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 473-491.

20. Suler, J. (2004). The Online Disinhibition Effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321-326.

21. Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. Penguin Press.

22. DeSteno, D. (2018). Emotional Success: The Power of Gratitude, Compassion, and Pride. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

23. Figley, C. R. (2002). Compassion Fatigue: Psychotherapists' Chronic Lack of Self Care. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(11), 1433-1441.

24. American Psychological Association. (2020). Stress in America 2020: A National Mental Health Crisis. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2020/report-october

25. Mehta, S. (2019). Beyond Vernacular Accommodations: The Limits of Kindness and Microaffirmations. Critical Philosophy of Race, 7(2), 267-297.

26. DiAngelo, R. (2018). White Fragility: Why It's So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism. Beacon Press.

27. Neff, K. D., & Germer, C. K. (2013). A Pilot Study and Randomized Controlled Trial of the Mindful Self-Compassion Program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(1), 28-44.

28. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2013). Full Catastrophe Living: Using the Wisdom of Your Body and Mind to Face Stress, Pain, and Illness. Bantam Books.

29. Nichols, M. P. (2009). The Lost Art of Listening: How Learning to Listen Can Improve Relationships. Guilford Press.

30. Curry, O. S., Rowland, L. A., Van Lissa, C. J., Zlotowitz, S., McAlaney, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2018). Happy to help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 320-329.

31. Cikara, M., Bruneau, E., & Saxe, R. (2017). Us and Them: Intergroup Failures of Empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 149-153.

32. Algoe, S. B., Fredrickson, B. L., & Gable, S. L. (2013). The social functions of the emotion of gratitude via expression. Emotion, 13(4), 605-609.

33. Zehr, H. (2015). The Little Book of Restorative Justice: Revised and Updated. Good Books.

34. Spade, D. (2020). Mutual Aid: Building Solidarity During This Crisis (and the Next). Verso Books.

35. Kraut, R., & Burke, M. (2015). Internet Use and Psychological Well-Being: Effects of Activity and Audience. Communications of the ACM, 58(12), 94-100.

36. Generations United. (2020). Intergenerational Programs & Spaces. Retrieved from https://www.gu.org/what-we-do/intergenerational-programs-spaces/

37. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). SAMHSA's Concept of Trauma and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4884.

38. Folbre, N. (2012). For Love and Money: Care Provision in the United States. Russell Sage Foundation.

39. Edmondson, A. (2018). The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth. Wiley.

40. Whyte, W. H. (2001). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Project for Public Spaces.

41. Ginwright, S. (2018). The Future of Healing: Shifting From Trauma Informed Care to Healing Centered Engagement. Medium. Retrieved from https://ginwright.medium.com/the-future-of-healing-shifting-from-trauma-informed-care-to-healing-centered-engagement-634f557ce69c

42. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The Impact of Enhancing Students' Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432.

43. Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Kitil, M. J., & Hanson-Peterson, J. (2017). To Reach the Students, Teach the Teachers: A National Scan of Teacher Preparation and Social & Emotional Learning. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.

44. Eyler, J., Giles, D. E., Jr., Stenson, C. M., & Gray, C. J. (2001). At A Glance: What We Know about The Effects of Service-Learning on College Students, Faculty, Institutions and Communities, 1993-2000. Vanderbilt University.

45. King, M. L., Jr. (2010). Stride Toward Freedom: The Montgomery Story. Beacon Press.

46. Hammond, Z. (2015). Culturally Responsive Teaching and The Brain: Promoting Authentic Engagement and Rigor Among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students. Corwin.